The situation in Assam, meanwhile, continues to be grim. There are around six million illegal Bangladeshis. The Gauhati HC had earlier this year said that “Bangladeshis had become kingmakers 
in Assam”, and stressed on the need for a “strong political will” to remedy the situation. Some 855 students had died in the Assam Agitation in the 1970s and ‘80s, a movement aimed at forcing the government to identify and deport illegals. The situation, however, shows no sign of improvement even after the SC scrapped the controversial Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act, 1983, a piece of legislation that was tailor-made to protect the illegal Bangladeshis in Assam.
Arunachal Pradesh, on the other hand, seems to gain immensely from the inner line permit provision that it has, being a sensitive border state, a provision that was often seen as an obstacle in the state’s development. Here too, however, the political will is striking compared to the scenario in Assam, which through full page advertisements declared that hundreds of alleged Bangladeshis, who had been pushed out of Arunachal and Nagaland a few months ago, were in reality Indian citizens, something that should have left to the judiciary to determine. “So far as our government is concerned,” said Tsering Gyurme, parliamentary secretary and principal adviser to Arunachal Pradesh CM Dorjee Khandu, ”the inner line permit does not allow even Indians to settle in our state. So there is no question of outsiders. We even insist on Arunachalis travelling out of the state to carry identity papers.” There is an increase in the number of illegal Bangladeshis now working in Itanagar. And what of the fact that the Tarun Gogoi government had declared that the suspected illegals pushed out of Arunachal were Indians? “That’s Gogoi’s problem,” Gyurme told TSI. All Bangladeshis who were working in Arunachal Pradesh had been identified and “could be shunted out anytime”, he added. “This is not like Assam where people can come in anytime, settle and get permanent resident certificates.”
The All Nyishi
Students’ Union (ANSU) had served a quit notice on alleged Bangladeshis in September this year. The students then physically removed a number of alleged illegals, which led to the All Minority Students’ Union in Assam blocking National Highway. While Arunachal home minister Jarbor Gamlin had at that stage said that there were around 8,000 illegal Bangladeshis in Arunachal, the state unit of the Congress had come out in support of the movement by Arunachali students. “We support any move to free the state of migrants,” Nabam Tuki, president of the state unit of the Congress had said at that point. Support for the innerline permit meanwhile only grows. He blamed the Border Security Force for letting in Bangladeshis. “No one goes from Assam to bring Bangladeshis into Assam,” he said, “the paramilitary forces simply let them in.”
And just how far are these governments willing to go to protect the rights of it heir people? One indicator would perhaps suffice: asked about the 1974 Indira-Mujib Pact, which has turned out to be a major impediment in so far as repatriation of Bangladeshi illegals from India is concerned, and which groups such as the Asom Gana Parishad (AGP) in Assam demand that the government renegotiate with Bangladesh, Lyngdoh was clear of his government’s stand: “Our state laws do not permit even Indian citizens to buy land in our district councils. So the Indira-Mujib Pact will not work here,” he said....Continue
in Assam”, and stressed on the need for a “strong political will” to remedy the situation. Some 855 students had died in the Assam Agitation in the 1970s and ‘80s, a movement aimed at forcing the government to identify and deport illegals. The situation, however, shows no sign of improvement even after the SC scrapped the controversial Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act, 1983, a piece of legislation that was tailor-made to protect the illegal Bangladeshis in Assam.Arunachal Pradesh, on the other hand, seems to gain immensely from the inner line permit provision that it has, being a sensitive border state, a provision that was often seen as an obstacle in the state’s development. Here too, however, the political will is striking compared to the scenario in Assam, which through full page advertisements declared that hundreds of alleged Bangladeshis, who had been pushed out of Arunachal and Nagaland a few months ago, were in reality Indian citizens, something that should have left to the judiciary to determine. “So far as our government is concerned,” said Tsering Gyurme, parliamentary secretary and principal adviser to Arunachal Pradesh CM Dorjee Khandu, ”the inner line permit does not allow even Indians to settle in our state. So there is no question of outsiders. We even insist on Arunachalis travelling out of the state to carry identity papers.” There is an increase in the number of illegal Bangladeshis now working in Itanagar. And what of the fact that the Tarun Gogoi government had declared that the suspected illegals pushed out of Arunachal were Indians? “That’s Gogoi’s problem,” Gyurme told TSI. All Bangladeshis who were working in Arunachal Pradesh had been identified and “could be shunted out anytime”, he added. “This is not like Assam where people can come in anytime, settle and get permanent resident certificates.”
The All Nyishi
Students’ Union (ANSU) had served a quit notice on alleged Bangladeshis in September this year. The students then physically removed a number of alleged illegals, which led to the All Minority Students’ Union in Assam blocking National Highway. While Arunachal home minister Jarbor Gamlin had at that stage said that there were around 8,000 illegal Bangladeshis in Arunachal, the state unit of the Congress had come out in support of the movement by Arunachali students. “We support any move to free the state of migrants,” Nabam Tuki, president of the state unit of the Congress had said at that point. Support for the innerline permit meanwhile only grows. He blamed the Border Security Force for letting in Bangladeshis. “No one goes from Assam to bring Bangladeshis into Assam,” he said, “the paramilitary forces simply let them in.”And just how far are these governments willing to go to protect the rights of it heir people? One indicator would perhaps suffice: asked about the 1974 Indira-Mujib Pact, which has turned out to be a major impediment in so far as repatriation of Bangladeshi illegals from India is concerned, and which groups such as the Asom Gana Parishad (AGP) in Assam demand that the government renegotiate with Bangladesh, Lyngdoh was clear of his government’s stand: “Our state laws do not permit even Indian citizens to buy land in our district councils. So the Indira-Mujib Pact will not work here,” he said....Continue
candidature as the Prime Minister in waiting, is in the throes of another ticklish query: while the party, allies and cadres accept Advani as their supreme leader, will the country, and more specifically Muslims, do the same when the time comes? Therefore, members of the parliamentary board have asked the state BJP chiefs to carry out an internal survey in various states for the consumption of their cadres and other party leaders. The question they have to address: what can be done to reform Advani’s hardline image and steps that need to be taken to improve and liberalise his image.
between Rane group (India) and NSK Ltd (Japan) with an equity capital of Rs.179 million. Today, it boasts of manufacturing plants in Chennai and Bawal (Haryana). The company has pumped in Rs.377 million in the recently opened Bawal plant which has an annual production capacity of two lakh electric power steering systems. “We have decided to invest in this plant keeping in mind with our overall strategic growth plans. RNSSL will grow in its chosen segments through expansion, upgraded technology and synergetic diversification,” says L. Ganesh, Chairman, Rane Group.
n that Indian pharma companies have lost their appetite? Or is it capital constraints giving them hiccups? “No”, says Anindya Acharya, Deputy Director, Drugs and Pharmaceuticals, CII. “It’s a well planned strategic move by the Indian pharma companies targeted towards improving their portfolios by entering certain niche segments rather than gobbling-up the entire portfolio of the prey.” Certainly, domestic pharma market is going through a transformation phase, led by strong underlying growth drivers and has witnessed robust growth over the last couple of years. According to a KPMG-CII Pharma Summit 2007 Report, the industry has grown at a CAGR of 13% from 2002-2007 and is further expected to grow at over 16% over 2007-2011. So there’s no dearth of future growth in the sector.
ur, Future Group et al which are charting out massive plans to grab ailing customers with their pharma retail stores. Then there is also the bitter truth about those ‘huge’ planned investments by ‘bigger’ players. So will it be a threat for MedPlus? Madhukar denies it as, “Others are focussing on both pharma and personal care, while we are/will be purely into medicine. Also, we have a massive expansion plan for every metro in South India. So by the time they come in, we will already have captured enough shelf-space!”